Social media communication during epidemics

We will be assessing the way social media has been used in the past by health authorities, doctors, nurses and patients, to spread messages during epidemics.
Notably, we are interested in social media’s role to spread reliable information to at-risk groups, but also its potential to spread misinformation. We want to explore the following areas:
- How has social media been used in previous epidemics to reach at-risk groups/spread health messages? (How have health authorities and doctors used it? What have patients used it for?)
- What’s the psychology behind social media? Does it compel users to help each other?
- Recommendations on how social media be used to spread relevant information more effectively
- How can social media be used to get different health professionals (doctors, nurses, etc) to communicate with each other and share infromation/advise patients?
- What are its limitations?
We will be posting on the next few months to gauge opinion and will be working with @nhssm who conduct a few Twitter chats, a blog, and scenario exercise, to explore the answers to some of these questions and find out how social media could be used by health professionals in the future to improve communication and disemminate reliable information.
Re: Social media communication during epidemics
Re: Social media communication during epidemics
We have had a good result in the past using the social media as an effective way to mass communication.
Psychologically people tend to follow mass or large scale media instructions.
It is beyond any doubts that the social media be involved in mass communication programs.
Also the social media, with help of the advanced communication methods can be able to achieve a good co-ordination between all the healthcare personalities.& help to share views of each other.
The limitations may sometimes be concerned with lack of technically detailed knowledge.
Re: Social media communication during epidemics
Social media is all about communication. I think only bloggers who are medical specialist and have high reputation can be source of such information.
Re: Social media communication during epidemics
Furthermore, I think social media has so much risk of being abused that it is risky that information placed on social media couldn't likewise be abused.
Hence what I think social media should be used for is promotion.
Social media communication during epidemics
We will be assessing the way social media has been used in the past by health authorities, doctors, nurses and patients, to spread messages during epidemics.
Notably, we are interested in social media’s role to spread reliable information to at-risk groups, but also its potential to spread misinformation. We want to explore the following areas:
- How has social media been used in previous epidemics to reach at-risk groups/spread health messages? (How have health authorities and doctors used it? What have patients used it for?)
- What’s the psychology behind social media? Does it compel users to help each other?
- Recommendations on how social media be used to spread relevant information more effectively
- How can social media be used to get different health professionals (doctors, nurses, etc) to communicate with each other and share infromation/advise patients?
- What are its limitations?
We will be posting on the next few months to gauge opinion and will be working with @nhssm who conduct a few Twitter chats, a blog, and scenario exercise, to explore the answers to some of these questions and find out how social media could be used by health professionals in the future to improve communication and disemminate reliable information.